We still see projects around Regina where the foundation design moves forward with nothing more than a desktop study and a few hand auger samples. The problem is, Regina sits on a deep sequence of glaciolacustrine clays and silts deposited by glacial Lake Regina — stiff at the surface, yes, but with a plasticity that can shift dramatically once you get past the desiccated crust. The SPT (Standard Penetration Test) cuts through the guesswork. It delivers N-values at regular depth intervals, and when the split spoon comes up, you get a disturbed sample you can actually look at. For the kind of lightly overconsolidated tills we encounter east of the city toward the Condie Moraine, we often pair the SPT with a CPT test to get a continuous tip resistance profile without gaps between spoon intervals. Understanding how the blow counts change with depth is what separates a footing that settles evenly from one that tilts toward the utility trench after a wet spring.
In Regina's glaciolacustrine clay, the difference between an N-value of 8 and an N-value of 15 can change your allowable bearing pressure by over 50 kPa — that is a foundation cost driver you want to nail down before the excavator arrives.
Local geotechnical context
Section 4.2 of the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC 2020) and CSA A23.3 put the responsibility on the geotechnical engineer to characterize the site with sufficient subsurface data — and in Regina, 'sufficient' means you have to sample through the entire clay sequence until you hit competent till or bedrock. The biggest risk we see is stopping the borehole too soon. A contractor drills to eight metres, gets N-values in the high teens, and calls it good — but at twelve metres there is a soft, normally consolidated layer that nobody found. Under the sustained load of a slab-on-grade warehouse in the Ross Industrial Park, that hidden layer compresses, and three years later the floor is out of level by forty millimetres. Another risk is misinterpreting gravel refusal. The Condie Moraine and the buried valleys around Regina can have lenses of coarse outwash sitting right on top of soft silt — the spoon hits gravel, the driller calls refusal, and the soft layer underneath gets missed entirely. When we see that scenario, we switch to rotary drilling to core through the obstruction and keep sampling. The cost of one extra hour of drilling is nothing compared to a differential settlement claim.
Applicable standards
ASTM D1586-18: Standard Test Method for Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils, CSA A23.3: Design of Concrete Structures — Foundation geotechnical input requirements, NBCC 2020, Division B, Part 4: Structural Design — Subsurface investigation provisions, Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual (CFEM), 4th Edition — SPT correlations for bearing capacity and settlement
Common questions
How much does an SPT investigation cost for a typical residential lot in Regina?
For a single-family residential lot inside city limits, with two boreholes to a depth of around 10 metres each, you are generally looking at CA$640 to CA$930 per borehole depending on access, drilling method, and whether we need to core through gravel lenses. That includes the field work, laboratory classification of the split spoon samples, and the geotechnical report with bearing capacity and settlement recommendations.
How deep do SPT boreholes need to go in Regina to satisfy the building code?
The NBCC does not prescribe a fixed depth — it requires that you investigate the soil that will actually be stressed by the foundation. In Regina, that means going through the entire glaciolacustrine clay sequence until you hit the glacial till or at least a depth where the stress increase from the footing drops below 10% of the in-situ effective stress. For a typical two-storey building on spread footings, that is usually between 12 and 18 metres, but we adjust based on the footing width and the loads.
What is the difference between the raw N-value and the N60 value reported on the log?
The raw N-value is the number of blows the hammer actually delivered in the field. The N60 corrects that number to a standard 60% hammer energy efficiency, because the actual energy delivered depends on the hammer type, the rod length, and whether the crew is using an automatic trip hammer or a rope-and-cathead setup. On our Regina jobs we use an automatic hammer with a known energy ratio, so the correction factor is measured, not assumed. You design with N60, not the raw number.
Can you do SPT testing in winter when the ground is frozen solid?
Yes — we work year-round in Regina. When the surface is frozen, we start the borehole with a core barrel or a solid-stem auger to get through the frozen crust, which can be over two metres thick in February. Once we are into unfrozen soil, we switch to the split spoon and run the SPT normally. The log notes will clearly mark the depth of the frozen zone so nobody misinterprets those refusal-like blow counts as a dense layer deeper down.